site stats

Pita vs court of appeals digest

WebbBefore us is a petition for review on certiorari against the decision and resolution of the Court of Appeals on CA-GR CV No. 33499 [1] affirming the decision of the Regional Trial … WebbThe Court of Appeals erred in affirming the decision of the trial court and, in effect, holding that the police officers could without any court warrant or order seize and confiscate petitioner's magazines on the basis simply of their determination that they are obscene. 2.

Pita Vs CA PDF Search And Seizure Search Warrant - Scribd

Webb5 okt. 1989 · PITA VS. COURT OF APPEALS [178 SCRA 362; G.R. NO.80806; 5 OCT 1989] HTTP Error 404.0 - Not Sunday, February 08, 2009 Posted by Coffeeholic Writes Found … WebbDigest PITA VS. CA- G.R. No. 80806 - Philippine Law. Decisions PITA VS. CA. PITA VS. CA. EN BANC G.R. No. 80806, October 05, 1989 LEO PITA, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE … red reeds https://fullthrottlex.com

Case Digest: Borjal vs. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 126466) - Blogger

Webb19 mars 2024 · Cases Digests. Tiu vs. CA. 2024-03-19 administrator. ... The Court of Appeals denied the petition as there is no substantial difference between the provisions of EO 97-A and Section 12 of RA 7227, holding that EO 97-A cannot be claimed to be unconstitutional while maintaining the validity of RA 7227; Webb10 mars 2024 · 1. On November 7, 1987, Jose P. Fernandez died. 2. Thereafter, a petition for the probate of his will was filed. 3. The probate court then appointed retired Supreme Court Justice Arsenio P. Dizon and petitioner, Atty. Rafael Arsenio P. Dizon as Special and Assistant Special Administrator. 4. WebbThe Court of Appeals erred in affirming the decision of the trial court and, in effect, holding that the police officers could without any court warrant or order seize and confiscate … red reef agriculture

G.R. No. 80806 - LEO PITA vs. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

Category:G.R. No. 80806 October 5, 1989 - LEO PITA v. COURT OF …

Tags:Pita vs court of appeals digest

Pita vs court of appeals digest

G.R. No. 126466 - Lawphil

WebbTHIRD DIVISION. G.R. No. 159751 December 6, 2006. GAUDENCIO E. FERNANDO and RUDY ESTORNINOS, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, respondent. D E C I S I O N. QUISUMBING, J.: This petition for review on certiorari assails the Decision 1 dated March 21, 2003 and the Resolution dated September 2, 2003, of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. … WebbThe Judge must determine whether or not the same are indeed “obscene” the question is to be resolved on a case-to-case basis and on his hand’s sound discretion; 4. If, in the opinion of the Court, probable cause exists, it may issue the Search Warrant; 5. Paper suit, Article 201; 6. Any conviction is subject to appeal Sundin Your Thoughts ...

Pita vs court of appeals digest

Did you know?

Webb5 okt. 1989 · Pita V CA G.R. No. 80806 October 5, 1989 J. Sarmiento Facts: In 1983, elements of the Special Anti-Narcotics Group, and the Manila Police, seized and … WebbG.R. No. L-40203 August 21, 1990 PATERNO J. OUANO, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and FRANCISCO B. ECHAVEZ, respondents. FACTS: 1… A parcel of land with an area of about 3,710 square meters, situated in Mandawe, Cebu, in the name of the registered owner, Rehabilitation 'Finance Corporation (RFC), now the Development Bank of the …

Webb28 nov. 2024 · Pita v. CA, 178 SCRA 362 (1989) FACTS: In pursuant to Anti-Smut Campaign initiated by the Mayor of the City of Manila, magazines, publications and other reading materials that are alleged to be obscene, pornographic and indecent were seized and … Webb14 mars 2006 · Garcia vs. Court of Appeals. Issue: Whether or not violation of Section 27 (b) of Rep. Act No. 6646, classified under mala. in se or mala prohibita. Whether or not good faith and lack of criminal intent be valid defenses. Ruling: No. Generally, mala in se felonies are defined and penalized in the Revised Penal. Code.

Webb10 feb. 2014 · LEO PITA vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, RAMON BAGATSING, and NARCISO CABRERA. G.R. No. 80806 October 5, 1989. Facts: ... Among the publications seized, and later burned, was "Pinoy Playboy" magazines published and co … WebbPita V. Court od Appeals ( (178 SCRA 162, 1989) (Case digest from: http://www.shvoong. Pita v. CA, 178 SCRA 362 (1989) F: Pursuant to the Anti-Smut Campaign of Mayor …

WebbThe Court of Appeals erred in affirming the decision of the trial court and, in effect, holding that the police officers could without any court warrant or order seize and confiscate …

WebbCase Digest National Power Corporation vs. THE Court OF Appeals - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION vs. THE - Studocu On November 15, 1973, the Office of the President of the Philippines sent Memorandum … richman 11 1.04richman 10 下载WebbPita v. CA, 178 SCRA 362 (1989) F: Pursuant to the Anti-Smut Campaign of Mayor Ramon Bagatsng, policemen seized and confiscated from dealers, distributors, newsstand owners and peddlers along Manila sidewalks, magazines, publications and other reading materials believed to be obscene, pornographic, and indecent and later burned the seized ... red reef advisors llcWebbSUPREME COURT Manila. SECOND DIVISION . G.R. No. 126466 January 14, 1999. ARTURO BORJAL a.k.a. ART BORJAL and MAXIMO SOLIVEN, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and FRANCISCO WENCESLAO, respondents. BELLOSILLO, J.: PERPETUALLY HAGRIDDEN as the public is about losing one of the most basic yet oft hotly contested freedoms of … richman10外挂WebbLEO PITA v. CA, GR No. 80806, 1989-10-05. Facts: The petitioner, publisher of Pinoy Playboy, a "men's magazine", seeks the review of the decision of the Court of Appeals,[1] … richman10打不开Webb1. The Court of Appeals erred in affirming the decision of the trial court and, in effect, holding that the police officers could without any court warrant or order seize and … richman10修改器Webb5 okt. 1989 · Pita vs. Court of Appeals, 178 SCRA 362, October 05, 1989 Facts: On December 1 and 3, 1983, pursuing an Anti-Smut Campaign initiated by the Mayor of the … red reef beach parking