WebNov 4, 2024 · No section 36 (1) (iii) disallowance unless Direct Nexus between Borrowed Funds & Capital Withdrawals Income Tax Judiciary No section 36 (1) (iii) disallowance unless Direct Nexus between Borrowed Funds & Capital Withdrawals editor2 Income Tax - Judiciary Download PDF 04 Nov 2024 1,284 Views 0 comment Case Law Details Web2 days ago · Section 36 (1) (iii) and Section 40 (b) (iv) both deal with payment of interest by the firm for which deduction could be claimed, therefore, keeping in mind the scheme of Chapter IV-D every assessee who claims deduction under Sections 30 to 38 is also requires to establish that it is not disentitled under Section 40.
26 CFR § 1.276-1 - Disallowance of deductions for certain indirect ...
WebJan 6, 2024 · The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act,1961 is not permissible on the ground of the absence of business-related activity. Ardor Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, the assessee company filed a return of income on 27.09.2014 declaring a total loss of… WebSection 276 is a disallowance provision exclusively and does not make deductible any expenses which are not otherwise allowed under the Code. For certain other rules in … エクセル 英語表記
Understanding Section 36 Deduction with Latest Case Laws
WebAn out-of-state active duty U.S. Army officer and his spouse, husband and wife, who reside in Washington under military orders, petition for correction of an assessment of use tax on two private motor vehicles, issued by the Compliance Division of the Department. We deny Taxpayers’ petition. Det. No. 18-0043, 38 WTD 165 (2024) 06/30/2024 WebMar 26, 2024 · Thus, the Assessing officer made disallowance under section 36 (1) (iii) of the Act applying the rate of 7.5% being the same rate at which the assessee had paid interest. On appeal CIT confirmed the order of the AO. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee company. WebNov 13, 2015 · The Assessing Officer disallowed the bad debts written off of Rs. 20,24,842/- on the ground that the amount of deduction claimed and allowed under the provisions of Section 36 (1) (viia) of the Act for bad and doubtful debts of Rs. 3 8,00,870/- is more than the bad debts claimed and also on the ground that the bad debts claimed pertained to … エクセル 行 1cm